Posted by: Jo Jordan on: November 14, 2008
Do I dare call myself a recession guru? Why not? I spent most of life working in a regional centre given to trouble and strife! If we weren’t rapidly readjusting to major political turmoil, we were adjusting to the effects of drought on agriculture which was our primary economy. In a good year, the economy expanded 3%. When the rains didn’t come, we went back 3%.
BNET published a good article today on time management. The centre piece of the article is the busy, busy person who is racing around being busy being busy.
Since I have come to live in the UK, I have been stunned by poor time management. I am amazed by someone who delegates his time management to a subordinate (usually blokes delegating to gals?). Beyond a junior levels of management, our tasks aren’t serial, they are interrelated.
Let me give you an example: I email you asking to discuss something. You email back to say yes and speak to your secretary. I write to her (usually). She consults you (or doesn’t). She writes back with some questions about time. I write back. She confirms.
7 emails to do something you had the power to do in your first reply. When I confirmed, that would be 3 emails.
The pre-email rule is that any piece of paper should come across your desk once and once only. You should have been sufficiently clear about your priorities to make a decision whether or not the meeting with me was important to you and how our meeting would move your major project forward.
All else is dross.
As HR practitioners, we have a major role in a recession:
Above all of course, we should be focused.
Can we answer this question ourselves? How many people in the organization could state the No 1 priority for
Remember, any one can do business in good times. It is the bad times that test our credentials.
Thanks for the reply.
I totally agree. It’s a strange thing to be involved in and almost an exciting thing too. For me, career wise and personally, this is a learning curve and perhaps a learning cycle.
I just find it interesting that in everything we do in the world there is a correction that happens somewhere in order to bring focus and regain control over things. I wonder when there will be a huge correction in population because that will be the next once surely?
[...] Acknowledgements 5 tips from the recession guru! [...]
Wow, that is extremely interesting. I really had no idea. I’m going to look into the butterfly affect. Is that a tested and proven theory or still in the early stages?
Do wars and human nature not present us with a correction? Surely when the population is increasing it causes an over-exposure of waste and usage etc and therefore creating a chemical response and subsequently a physical retalliation. Death! Ha.
November 14, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Great view on the recession.
I recently attended an interesting meeting where a seemingly bright person within the property market said that his business and himself had planned for the recession a year ago. He mentioned something of a 60 year cycle where a correction in the market occurs and we’re now at the 60th year.
Have you heard much around this? I’m very interested in this 60 Year cycle and are you referring to this in your blog? You mention cycles but wasn’t the eighties a huge correction in the property market?
From what I understand from the 80s crash was that people got greedy, changed their lifestyle to fit their image, increased their property sizes because it was a good market and all without proper considerations in place or plans set aside should they not be able to make the arrangements – THE ENDOWMENT POLICY.
Well it seems we were at that point 18 months ago… I once lent money to those who wish to buy a property and instead of an endowment policy as a means to ‘make the lender happy for paper trail purposes’ there was something called a Self-certification mortgage (and still is). This recession should have been spotted back in 2003 when self-cert mortgages were being investigated and companies mis-selling the idea of a self-certification application.
So, if there is a cycle, and there are investigations into suspected practices, where do the rea problems lie?
x