Posted by: Jo Jordan on: November 4, 2009
Some time ago, I worked with people who used the word “hate”, a lot. I was mesmerized. I “loathed” doing my tax return. I “loathed” broccoli (I like it now – good with a lemon sauce). But “hate”?
Hate is an active word. Hate is a doing word. When we hate something, we want to do it harm. I didn’t want to do my tax return harm. It wish it wouldn’t bother me. But I didn’t want to do it harm.
I also never used the word loathe for people, either. I sometimes said that “I can’t stand so-and-so”. I didn’t want to be around them and avoided them if I could.
More often I would say something like “I think so-and-so annoys me because <reason>”. Once, my reason was that “he seems to think he is my equal.” My interlocutor agreed with me. “I think that’s why he annoys me too.”
With that out of the way, we could relate to this “johnny-come-lately” without visible annoyance and without allowing our sense of his impudence to impede a constructive relationship.
Hate is closely linked to anger, of course. Some people make a career of anger. Others have had so much go wrong in their lives that they’ve lost hope of being treated decently.
For that is what anger is about. Disappointment and dejection that people who we treat well, treat us badly.
So my colleagues had probably had hard lives. At the time, I was young, so I thought they should get on with being positive. I sure they could have done. With age I have become more compassionate and recognize that they might have had a lot of shit-happen.
If hate is a contorted emotion, so is anger. It is so easy to help someone who is angry. Agree with them. Let them know that it is OK to be angry. Watch them relax as their status is restored. Then help them make a plan.
It is much harder to deal with your own anger. The triangle of disappointment locks us in.
We are left with 4 choices.
This choice of 4 bad choices is why social support is so necessary.
In well run families and work organizations, uncles and aunts and other senior members of the organization step in to resolve conflicts.
Sadly, when we are made angry we don’t tell many people. We are already suffering from an acute sense of shame and aren’t going to advertise our loss of status to the world.
Unless the uncles and aunts and elders of an organization or community are alert, a lot of anger gets buried. Pressures and tensions build up and eventually they explode.
The trouble with anger is that its resolution is in the hands of the transgressor. If the transgressor does not apologize quickly, then we are in a lose-lose situation. It doesn’t matter how you deal with anger – you are still in a lose-lose situation and yours style is just a matter of preference.
Maybe we should just live an “extreme life”? Deliberately work with people who make us angry for a longish period until we settle on a style that makes the best of lose-lose situations – though there is nothing best in them.
Or we could be like Ben Zander, the orchestra conductor who lectures on positive psychology: apologize and invite.
Apologize to the person who made us angry and invite them join in. Would that work for you?
Albeo theme by Design Disease
Recent Comments