Posted by: Jo Jordan on: November 8, 2009
I am a work & organizational psychologist and I might even administer an intelligence test to you if you apply to one of my clients. I can promise you one thing.
No matter who the client is, or what they do, it will matter if your IQ were 25% higher or lower. That is an big enough change to be important.
Yet, the way we are managed affects our IQ by that amount – 25%. According to Ray Baumeister, all of the following will cause your IQ to plummet by that amount.
Most likely because bad management is like a neurosis. If I am scared of snakes, then I won’t go near them and I will never learn how to interact with them safely.
Bad managers become anxious about performance, snarl and snap, and make their staff anxious. And performance falls confirming their worst expectations. Rinse and repeat and they never learn how to manage well.
Not IMHO. Employing people does not confer the right of psychological assault.
Reducing people’s IQ by 25% does not just affect their behavior at work either. It affects their driving, their parenting, and their understanding of wider issues.
Big firms who use psychological tests should be asked to show that they are not assaulting their staff. That is a regulatory burden I know, but I understand that Scandavian countries have ‘happiness’ legislation in place.
I’ve also worked in places where the ethos is that ‘if you can’t afford to employ, then don’t’.
Manage well, and you have a competitive advantage of 25% of IQ!
A cheerful staff who feel they belong will turn into innovation, creativity, problem solving, fewer errors and better ideas.
That’s money in our pockets. I hope Baumeister also experiments with the reverse proposition. Create a sense of belonging and show higher team performance!
Recent Comments