5 years’ time: where will we be?
Posted November 24, 2008on:
Image by Xavier Fargas via Flickr
Skate to where the puck will be
“She’ll be alright”. “Manyana, manyana”. We may not wear this attitude on our sleeves but we English are notorious short-term thinkers. Not for us saving for a rainy day or a stitch in time.
Is it healthy though, to plan ahead? Isn’t planning ahead exactly the opposite of what is recommended by positive psychologists: be mindful and attentive to what is going on around us?
The difficulty with living in the present seems to me that we can be living in the past. Just as the ice hockey player skates to where the puck will be, we have to interpret the present in terms of the energy and dynamism that it represents. One of the beautiful phrases asked by positive organizational scholars emerging in the business schools in the US is: what is trying to emerge here?
What will the UK look like in 5 years’ time?
In some respects, I am sure the UK will not have changed much. An endearing quality of the UK is that it piles layer over layer. A scratch below the surface is always interesting.
There will also be some trends that will stretch out linearly. For the most part, those people who already here will still be here. 5 year olds will be 10. 40 year olds will be 45. 75 year olds will be 80. Some people will be off exploring the world, but we will mostly be here. Even in Zimbabwe, most people are still there!
But some things will change qualitatively, fundamentally, or definitively.
I have just read a prediction that IN FIVE YEARS, Africa will overtake China as the supplier of low cost labor.
On line virtual laboratory
Being linked to universities, another prediction that caught my eye is that new ideas will no longer come out of US business schools. Nor will they come out of Chinese or Indian business schools. They will come out of ‘on line virtual laboratories’. There are obvious implications for universities who carry on treating the value chain as the long 7 year process of thinking up ideas, testing them, and publishing them.
Similar changes are being predicted in journalism. Jeff Jarvis predicts changes even deeper than those predicted for academia. Editors will no longer drive news policy. They will encourage the creation of better news.
So what is my time line?
From time-to-time, I play with Curriculum Illusione in which you input what you think will happen between now and the year you die (chosen by yourself). It is interesting how hard it is, particularly when you have to back up your ideas with photos.
So where are we exactly?
Or maybe, the question for today is what do we need to know?
Is it sufficient to get up and go to work and just hope for the best?