Posts Tagged ‘HR strategy’
One of the biggest complaints we hear from businesses is that they cannot hire the skills they want in the UK market. It’s called the talent war.
I want to show you a simple calculation I did for someone that might explain what is giving you a headache in your recruitment and selection.
This little firm was looking for ‘partners’ to work in a role similar to agents or franchisees. Their partners don’t have to have any particular qualification, so they should be easy to recruit. After a little thinking and talking, this is what we came up with.
- The partners don’t have to be super-bright, just normal bright and have finished high school .
- The partners should be energetic & persistent and are likely to have demonstrated this energy by excelling in competitive sport, the arts, or some activity that has required them to make a clearly great effort than their peers.
- The partners should be entrepreneurial. They should have a history of trying things out and be just as happy when things don’t work out. They are curious.
- The partners need to be honest. I don’t mean financially meticulous – I mean wanting to deliver a good service. They are likely to have done something well in the past even when people around them wanted to take shortcuts.
Running the numbers
Now we can add some figures to this model and here is where you might get a surprise.
Let me remind you of some figures.
- The midpoint on any characteristic divides the world 50:50.
- The next step up divides the world 83:17.
- And then next level up divides the world 97:3.
These splits correspond to 3 standard deviations on the right hand side of a normal curve. You might recall that? We could use finer divides but we will start with these to get a preliminary fix on where we are going.
The people we are looking for do not have to be super intelligent. University and above is at the 83:17 divide. We are happy at the 50:50 divide. Below that, people may have trouble filling in commercial documents.
Energy & persistence
We are looking for someone who stood out in some way – played at the highest levels of school sport, for example, or raised a lot of money for charity, or even did well at academics. Probably at the 97:3 split. Someone who took a big prize at school.
These people don’t wait for someone to tell them what to do. They work things out and find new opportunties. They aren’t people for the sausage-machine of institutions. They are the people who make us think, “I wish I had done that”, or “How did you think of that?” And they view setbacks as adventures. 97:3
Unusual levels of integrity and sincerity. At least once in their lives, they’ve done something properly when people around them were spinning, skiving or taking shortcuts. 97:3
How many people in the UK fit this description?
There are 30 million people in UK of working age. How many of them fit this description and are candidates for our recruitment and selection drive?
Half of them have the intelligence required: 15 million
3% of the top half of intelligent people are very energetic and persistent : 450 000
3% of these have unusual levels of entrepreneurial spirit or curiosity: 13 500
3% of these have the commitment to integrity that we need: 405
(and this is from aged 16 to 65 – 405 people in the UK match our specification).
And how many of the right people are looking for a job?
Well, first of all let’s look at turnover. It is usually 14% a year in the UK and that includes the high churn sectors like hospitality and catering. Even if we bump up the turnover rate arbitrarily to 20% for the recession, we have only (.2 x 400) =80 people in our group who are looking for a job.
And of course some of these are doctors and lawyers, and some people are in the wrong sectors or wrong part of UK. They are not available to be recruited or selected by us.
Not many left are there?
Shocking isn’t it?
I am used to the process of selection and to these numbers, yet they still shock me. So please find my error and dm me. I am hoping you will find my mistake because the numbers are shocking.
My point – and it is a serious point – is that you cannot have one demanding requirement after another.
There simply aren’t enough people in the UK to meet your demanding needs.
There aren’t enough exceptional people in the economy to run it if is based on exceptional talent.
Our businesses need to run with normal people.
- When we are selecting, it’s best to set the minimum requirements of the job, preferably from the candidate’s point of view, and begin there. Trim your list. Ask, “Is this feature absolutely required, and if so why?”
- Stop adding requirement after requirement! No more than three requirements!
- After that, be ruthless in thinking about this recruitment assignment from the candidate’s point of view.
Ruthless in thinking about selection from the candidate’s point-of-view.
No one taught you that at uni, did they? Yep, we like to keep some secrets to ourselves.
But now, it’s yours.
Review your HR specifications. And keep it real. Let your competitors be the ones to live in the world of make-believe.
Day One at Xoozya (cont’d)
Mary, the HR Body put her cheerful face around the door and said “Lunch”. Yep, I was keen. There is just so much that I can take in at one time and the Dashboard at Xoozya is pretty comprehensive.
She dangled a key. “Bring valuables,” she said, “but leave everything else as it is. We’ll lock the door”.
The canteen wasn’t far and I could hear the buzz as we approached. It was just as hyped. Salads, fruit and hot food and the refreshing absence of the cloying smell of old fat and overcooked vegetables. Sweet.
Mary, ever the professional, asked nimbly whether I ate fish. I do, and she said, “I’ll get two fish pies – they’re good. You grab some salads. I’d like plain lettuce and tomato and pear or some fruit. Water OK to drink?” I caught up with her at the cashier where she introduced me as noobe and I put my food on my tab. We grabbed napkins and cutlery and she led the way to a corner table. “We’ll join Peter Wainwright, the HR Director. You remember him, of course?”
As we approached, Peter rose, smiled warmly, and said “Hello, Jo. Welcome to Xoozya! Here’s to a prosperous and happy alliance.”
We fumbled around, as one does, arranging trays and getting comfortable and he asked about my morning. I told him it was clear I have some thinking to do to set up a communication system that leaves me informed but not overwhelmed with information.
He nodded and added: “Well, take your time. Every minute that you spend in exploration now pays off handsomely in comfort and organization later. We also want you to base your judgments on what matters. You’ve joined us with your skills, as has everyone else here,” he said, waiving his hand at the crowded canteen.
Future capability and value
“There are skills that are essential to what you do and there are skills that will change with technological change.”
- “We want you to jot down the skills that are absolutely essential to what you do. These we will nurture and respect.”
- “Then there are skills that are going to change significantly over the next five to ten years. We want those on a separate list because those require significant investment in time and energy”.
- “And there are skills that we don’t use anymore. Those we give a respectful burial.” He smiled. “When we have identified a skill or process that we no longer use, we get an occupational psychologist to document it and we make a display for our skills museum. Then we have a little wake,” he chuckled, “to see it off. It’s quite cathartic.”
Nostalgia for skills & practices of the past
“So which skill in the museum is best-loved?” I asked. “Which grave attracts the most flowers?”
“Ah, we hadn’t thought of doing that. Good idea. We should put the skills up on the intranet with the choice of . . . flowers or . . . a good kick . . . or a big ? mark for ‘who was this!’. And see what we get back!”
My induction so far
Well, I obviously have some thinking to do. It is only lunchtime and I have to think about
Which skills are utterly essential to your work?
And which will change so fundamentally in the next five years that you will need to retrain?
And which skills deserve a respectful burial?
Which are you happy to see go and which will you miss?
And if you are enjoying this series, please do feel free to join in!
- Leave your thoughts in the comment section
- Grab the RSS feeds for posts and comments top right
- If you comment on this post from your blog, please link back to this post from the words Jo Jordan, flowingmotion, or Xoozya
- Tweet the post
- Stumble the post
And PS, if you are new to this blog, Xoozya is an utterly fictitious organization. This series began on the spur of the moment as I started to explored the principles of games design and Ned Lawrence of Church of Ned mentioned how much time people put into designing their avatars, or online identities. Xoozya is an attempt to imagine what an organization would look, sound and feel like if it were run along lines recommended by contemporary management theorists.
And PPS Ned is an online writing coach and is available for hire.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Avatar as a role description (flowingmotion.wordpress.com)